What are the rules for calling for new elections in NC?

RALEIGH – The 9th District fraud saga seems to be reaching critical mass. Democrats called for a new election immediately after hints of fraud by vendors of Republican candidate Mark Harris. State Republican leaders pushed back, pointing out that the numbers of ballots in question were not enough to change the result of the election, and therefore election of Harris (the unofficial winner) should be certified by the State Board of Elections while the investigation went forward.

Indeed, three of the four tripwires written in state statute for calling a new election require enough votes to be in question to change the result of the race if they were thrown out. While new corroborations of sketchy vote harvesting in Bladen County (and other counties) seems to be dripping out every hour, hard evidence of fraudulent activity doesn’t seem, at this point, to meet that threshold.

Mark Harris led the vote totals by 905 votes. Even an avalanche of fraud evidence in Bladen County would likely come up short, though it’d be close if every absentee ballot requested by ring leader Leslie Mccrae Dowless and his crew were deemed to either be illegally tampered with, or illegally discarded.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED(2)

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to First In Freedom Daily updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: FIRE THEM: UNC faculty threaten to NOT TEACH over ‘Silent Sam’ Plans

However, the hard numbers of votes in question may not even matter at this point, because the fourth tripwire for calling for a new election is a lot more subjective.

While the first three require a possible change in the outcome of a race due to fraud, the fourth only requires “irregularities or improprieties occurred to such an extent that they taint the results of the entire election and cast doubt on its fairness.”

Had this been a smaller race with less media attention, the apparent fraud probably would not rise to the level ‘tainting’ the entire election. Likewise, if a Democrat had been the victor, even with the same level of fraud, the Left-leaning media undoubtedly would have snoozed on the story.

But it was neither of those scenarios. It was an important congressional race that stood to affect the majority control of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Democrat narrowly lost.

As such, the media has gone full speed ahead with coverage and investigative reporting to a level that is sure to ‘taint’ the perception of fairness in this race. Not that it doesn’t rise to the level of being tainted, or that severe consequences should not be doled to everyone directly involved in committing fraud, but does anyone honestly believed the attention wold have reach the national level if the partisan labels were reversed?

The media storm is raging over the 9th District, and legitimate evidence of fraud is fueling the convection. It appears likely that the election has been tainted to the point of casting doubt on its fairness due to the media attention alone.

Often times political news quiets down after election day, as people get into the holiday spirit and focus on other things. 2018 is going to be different.

Have a hot tip for First In Freedom Daily?

Got a hot news tip for us? Photos or video of a breaking story? Send your tips, photos and videos to tips@firstinfreedomdaily.com. All hot tips are immediately forwarded to FIFD Staff.

Have something to say? Send your own guest column or original reporting to submissions@firstinfreedomdaily.com.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.