DALLAS, TX – A Texas father says his son’s mother is forcing their seven year old biological boy to get a chemical castration as part of a gender transition says . He was in court fighting for sole custody to stop a gender transition he says is against his son’s will. A jury just ruled AGAINST the father.
While most of the taboos associated with the transgender movement are easily anesthetized with a ‘live and let live’ mantra, the perverted push to encourage gender confused children to medically modify themselves at an early age is different. Such pushes or facilitation of hormone therapy or sex transitions of young children are arguably child abuse, and that’s even when the child in question is complicit to the extent they can be.
But the father, Jeffrey Younger, says his child is not transgender, that he is not a willful participant in this ‘transition,’ and that his mother is manipulating him during her custody periods. Again, this boy is SEVEN YEARS OLD.
Unbelievably, the boy’s mother is a doctor, and she is the one that brought the suit against the father in an attempt to slash the amount of time the boy. Apparently the father was a hindrance to the forced sexual transition of his SEVEN YEAR OLD BOY. The father countered, demanding a jury trial.
From Life News:
“A jury in Dallas, Texas has ruled against Jeffrey Younger, the father who is trying to protect his seven-year-old son, James, from chemical castration via a gender “transition.” This means James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, will be able to continue “transitioning” him into “Luna,” and now has full authority to start him on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones.
The jury’s decision likely means that Mr. Younger will be required to “affirm” James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections, and will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.
Dr. Georgulas, who brought the lawsuit, was asking Mr. Younger’s possession schedule be altered to decrease overnight stays and to force his visits with the boys to be supervised. Dr. Georgulas brought the original modification suit to the court and did not request a jury trial. Mr. Younger, in his counter-petition, asked for a jury trial. Since Mr. Younger requested the jury trial, the jury ruled on his specific request for Sole Managing Conservatorship and the judge ruled on all other aspects of the petition as brought by Dr. Georgulas.
She was also asking that Jeff be forbidden from calling his son James – his given and legal name – and that he be prohibited from bringing James around people who do not “affirm” James as a “girl.” […]”
What post-modernist horror show are we living in where a father is stripped of his parental rights so that a mother can get their SEVEN YEAR OLD BOY a sex change? In this world we live in today the one intent upon chemical castration and forced gender transition of a SEVEN YEAR OLD BOY, biology notwithstanding, is being rewarded, while the parent seeking to protect their SEVEN YEAR OLD BOY from a such a miserable abuse is the one effectively being punished. He has to take a class on transgenderism and loses the custody he did have. Another intriguing wrinkle is that the boy was conceived via in vitro fertilization (with a twin brother), and is not even biologically related to the mother.
But the biological father’s concerns are crystal clear for most parents living in this fancy place we call reality, where cross-gender therapies and surgeries can and do lead to a lifetime of psychological and physical misery, especially for younger children.
Do you think a SEVEN YEAR OLD BOY has the ability to fully comprehend the potential side effects of such therapy, such as permanent infertility, inability to ever naturally engage in sexual relations, and a decreased lifespan? Experts don’t. Which is why a parent or custodian pushing such a young child into these life changing procedures is completely unethical.
Luckily, there is still a chance this boy can be saved from his dangerously woke mother. While the father lost custody, the jury decided that the mother may not be best for the child, either. (You think?!) The judge is reportedly announcing a decision on custody on Wednesday. In the meantime, concerned citizens in Texas are asking state lawmakers to make it illegal for anyone under 18 years of age to begin a medical transition. They argued that children cannot fully understand the lifelong consequences of their decisions and parents should not be allowed to make this decision for their children.