Appeals Court Upholds Charlotte I-77 Toll Lane Deal

The state Court of Appeals has rejected a legal challenge to a project adding toll lanes along a Charlotte-area interstate, ruling Tuesday that the state acted lawfully when it made the deal with a private toll operator.

The challenge was filed by a group that advocated for widening Interstate 77 without adding tolls, reflecting criticism that made the project an issue in last year’s close governor’s race. The group had argued that the state made an unconstitutional deal with a private company to build and operate the toll lanes.

But a three-judge appeals court panel ruled unanimously that the deal was struck lawfully, siding with a lower court that rebuffed the challenge last year.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?

  • Will the Democrats try to impeach President Trump now that they control the House?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to First In Freedom Daily updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: There’s a new sheriff in town, and he starts with sanctuary for illegals

Construction has begun on the toll lanes that will run about 26 miles (40 kilometers) from Charlotte north to Mooresville. The stretch will still feature non-tolled lanes, and the tolls will be charged electronically or mailed to drivers, according to the state Transportation Department.

Around the time the deal was made in 2014, state officials said the toll lanes would help reduce travel time and congestion along the busy stretch of highway north of the state’s largest city. The contract allows I-77 Mobility Partners, a subsidiary of Cintra , to operate the lanes and collect tolls.

The group that opposed the deal, WidenI77, contended the state unlawfully gave the company authority to set toll rates, among other arguments.

But the appeals judges wrote that the state has put in adequate safeguards, including the requirement of public hearings on toll rates and reports to state officials.




Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here